Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 45, Number 1 > Pp. 33-38

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khromova, V. Articles by Gray, T. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original Article

Learning needs in clinical biochemistry for doctors in foundation years

Victoria Khromova and Trevor A Gray 

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Corresponding author: Dr Trevor A Gray. Email: trevor.gray{at}sth.nhs.uk

Background: Most medical school curricula have reduced the amount of time available for teaching in pathology despite the fact that junior staff in the early stages of their training were responsible for requesting the majority of pathology tests on acutely ill hospital patients. So, the lack of specific training in this area means that test requesting may be poorly performed and the results ill understood by these staff. This paper describes a questionnaire, which was designed to assist laboratory staff providing targeted teaching in this area.

Methods: Doctors in Foundation year 1 (F1) and Foundation year 2 (F2) in Sheffield teaching hospitals were given a questionnaire to ascertain how confident they were in requesting and interpreting the results of clinical biochemistry tests. The doctors were also asked about which areas of laboratory medicine they would like to be taught.

Results: Responses were received from 82 doctors, about half those in F1 and F2. The survey revealed areas where juniors are less confident in requesting tests and interpreting results. Despite lack of confidence in interpreting the result, 18% were confident about requesting tests. Doctors were also unsure of the effects of common problems like haemolysis on the interpretation of results. More than 70% of the doctors requested specific teaching in these areas.

Conclusions: Foundation doctors have learning needs in clinical biochemistry, addressing which would assist them in patient care. While better training in medical school may help in future, there are specific needs for those on the wards now that require targeted teaching.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J C Stanfliet, J Macauley, and T S Pillay Quality of teaching in chemical pathology: ability of interns to order and interpret laboratory tests J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2009; 62(7): 664 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H. Wians Jr. Clinical Laboratory Tests: Which, Why, and What Do The Results Mean? Lab Med, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 105 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Wood and C. van Heyningen Junior doctors' use of the clinical biochemistry service Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 82 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J Schunemann, A. D Oxman, J. Brozek, P. Glasziou, P. Bossuyt, S. Chang, P. Muti, R. Jaeschke, and G. H Guyatt GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations Evid. Based Med., December 1, 2008; 13(6): 162 - 163. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B Freedman Is the medical undergraduate curriculum 'fit for purpose'? Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]