RSM logo
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:50-58
doi:10.1258/acb.2007.007147
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waud, J. P
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, A. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Original Article

Measurement of breath hydrogen and methane, together with lactase genotype, defines the current best practice for investigation of lactose sensitivity

Jonathan P Waud 1, Stephanie B Matthews 1 and Anthony K Campbell 2 


1 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Immunology, Llandough Hospital, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Llandough, Vale of Glamorgan, South Wales, Cardiff CF64 2XX; 2 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Immunology, Cardiff University, Tenovus Building, Heath Park Campus, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK


Corresponding author: Prof Anthony K Campbell. Email: campbellak{at}cf.ac.uk


Background: Currently, there is no ‘gold standard’ for detecting patients with sensitivity to lactose. Biochemical investigation by a breath hydrogen test alone detects <50% cases. Breath methane and symptoms are not recorded as standard practice. The clinical value of analysing C/T13910 and G/A22018 polymorphisms, strongly associated with lactose sensitivity, has not been established.

Methods: Two hundred and ten patients with unexplained gut and systemic symptoms and controls were challenged with 50 g lactose. Breath hydrogen and methane were measured and symptoms recorded. All were genotyped for two polymorphisms, C/T13910 and G/A22018.

Results: CC13910/GG22018 in 14.5%, CT13910/GA22018 in 39% and TT13910/AA22018 in 46.5%. One hundred percent of CC13910/GG22018 were lactose sensitive having a breath hydrogen >20 ppm within 6 h and symptoms. But the breath hydrogen test lacked sensitivity and specificity in the other groups. There was elevated breath hydrogen in 21% of CT13910/GA22018 and 15% of TT13910/AA22018 by 6 h, whereas 17 and 30.9% had elevated breath methane alone. Breath methane and breath hydrogen with clinical symptoms improved sensitivity and specificity, increasing detection of lactose sensitivity in genotypes CT/GA and TT/AA from <50 to >75%.

Conclusions: The data presented define the current best practice for the clinical identification of lactose sensitivity. Patients were first genotyped. Those identified as CC with symptoms should immediately undertake a 12-week lactose-free diet. Those identified as CT or TT should undertake a breath hydrogen and methane test. Those positive for hydrogen or methane along with symptoms or with symptoms only, should also undertake a lactose-free diet. Those with high hydrogen without symptoms should be investigated for causes other than lactose sensitivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor