Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 45, Number 2 > Pp. 140-148

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carstensen, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original Article

Measurement of blood glucose: comparison between different types of specimens

Bendix Carstensen ¹ , J Lindström ², J Sundvall ³, K Borch-Johnsen ¹, J Tuomilehto ^2 4 the DPS Study Group

¹ Steno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark; ² Diabetes Unit; ³ Department of Health and Disability, National Public Health Institute; ⁴ Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, FI-00300 Helsinki, Finland

Corresponding author: Dr Bendix Carstenen. Email: bxc{at}steno.dk

Aim: To provide conversion formulae between measurements based on different specimens in use in epidemiological studies and clinical practice, and to evaluate the relative precision for the different methods.

Background: The current guidelines emphasize the use of venous plasma for determining glucose concentration. Nevertheless, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines provide cut-off points for different specimens for the determination of the glucose concentration in circulating blood (venous plasma, whole blood, serum and capillary blood). There is a lack of data about the comparability between the values obtained by using different specimens.

Methods: Eleven different combinations of specimens and methods of measurement of blood glucose were used in 294 blood samples from 74 subjects. The methods were grouped by the specimen used for analysis (venous plasma, whole blood, serum and capillary blood).

Results: The result of the analysis is a set of linear equations allowing conversion of the result from one specimen or method to another. Furthermore, it was estimated how much of the variation for each method can be attributed to laboratory variance.

Conclusions: Measurements based on capillary blood had a very large variability compared with other methods. Measurements based on venous whole blood tended to give results 0.5 mmol/L lower than other methods. Our data indicate that the current diagnostic cut-off points, as recommended by WHO for non-plasma specimens, are not fully compatible and may differ as much as 0.5 mmol/L between specimens.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?