RSM logo
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:199-205
doi:10.1258/acb.2007.007078
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadfield, S G
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Original Article

Are patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia well managed in lipid clinics? An audit of eleven clinics from the Department of Health Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cascade Testing project

S G Hadfield 1, S Horara 1, B J Starr 1, S Yazdgerdi 1, D Bhatnagar 2, R Cramb 3, S Egan 4, R Everdell 4, G Ferns 5, A Jones 6, C B Marenah 7, J Marples 8, P Prinsloo 7, A Sneyd 7, M F Stewart 9, L Sandle 10, T Wang 5 11, M S Watson 5 and S E Humphries 12 


1 London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK; 2 The Royal Oldham Hospital, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Rochdale Road, Oldham OL1 2JH, UK; 3 The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; 4 Royal Bournemouth Hospital, The Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Trust, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, UK; 5 Royal Surrey County Hospital, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XX, UK; 6 Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK; 7 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; 8 Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Trust, Wigan Lane, Wigan WN1 2NN, UK; 9 Hope Hospital, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK; 10 Trafford General Hospital, Trafford Healthcare NHS Trust, Moorside Road, Davyhulme, Manchester M41 5SL, UK; 11 Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth Road, Frimley, Surrey GU16 7UJ, UK; 12 British Heart Foundation Laboratories, Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, The Rayne Building, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6JJ, UK


Corresponding author: Professor S E Humphries. Email: rmhaseh{at}ucl.ac.uk


Background: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal co-dominant disorder which is relatively common, leads to high levels of LDL-cholesterol and if untreated to early coronary heart disease. An audit of current practice at National Health Service Trusts in England was undertaken to determine whether FH patients meet the diagnostic criteria for FH; are being offered appropriate advice and treatment; and to what extent their families are contacted and offered testing for the disorder.

Methods: Medical records of known FH patients (over 18 years of age and diagnosed before 31 December 2003) were accessed to obtain information on diagnosis, treatment and family tracing.

Results: The records of 733 FH patients were examined, 79% met the UK ‘Simon Broome’ register criteria for the diagnosis of definite or possible FH. Analyses showed that patients were usually offered appropriate advice and treatment, with 89% being on a statin. However, the audit indicated a high variability in family tracing between the sites, with significant differences in the frequency of inclusion of a family pedigree in the notes (range 1–71%, mean 35%); the general practitioner (GP) being advised that first-degree relatives should be tested (range 4–52%, mean 27%); and the proportion of relatives contacted and tested (range 6–50%, mean 32%).

Conclusion: FH patients are well cared for in lipid clinics in England, are being given appropriate lifestyle advice and medication, but an increase in recording of LDL-cholesterol levels may lead to improvements in their management. Practice in family tracing appears to vary widely between clinics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
R Minhas, S E Humphries, N Qureshi, H A W Neil, and on behalf of the NICE Guideline Development Group
Controversies in familial hypercholesterolaemia: recommendations of the NICE Guideline Development Group for the identification and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia
Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 584 - 587.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
S G Hadfield, S Horara, B J Starr, S Yazdgerdi, D Marks, D Bhatnagar, R Cramb, S Egan, R Everdell, G Ferns, et al.
Family tracing to identify patients with Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: the second Audit of the Department of Health Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cascade Testing Project
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 24 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



MDU Exam Doctor