RSM logo
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:463-466
doi:10.1258/acb.2008.007252
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Erasmus, R. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Original Articles

Incomplete laboratory request forms: the extent and impact on critical results at a tertiary hospital in South Africa

Louise Nutt, Annalise E Zemlin and Rajiv T Erasmus


Division of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Parow 7505, South Africa


Corresponding author: Dr Louise Nutt. Email: lnutt{at}sun.ac.za


Background: Research has demonstrated that most laboratory errors occur in the preanalytical phase of testing. In view of the paucity of studies examining preanalytical errors, we evaluated our laboratory request forms for the frequency and impact of incomplete data.

Methods: This study examined all request forms received at our laboratory during a five-day period. The forms were scrutinized for the presence of specific parameters. The impact of abbreviated diagnoses was analysed, as well as how lack of ward or telephone details affects the communication of critical results to clinicians.

Results: A total of 2550 request forms were analysed. Medication(s) used by the patient (89.6%) and doctor’s contact number (61.2%) were the most incomplete parameters. No diagnosis was provided on 19.1% of forms, and when a diagnosis was present it was an abbreviated form in 37.3%. This resulted in 35.5% of diagnoses not being recorded by reception staff. Incomplete ward information was found on 4.9% of forms. In a separate search, the impact of 151 request forms (collected over a period of eight months), with incomplete ward location information and corresponding to critical results was assessed. Critical results were not communicated by telephone to clinicians in 19.9% of cases.

Conclusion: As laboratory data influences 70% of medical diagnoses, incorrect or incomplete data provided to the laboratory could significantly impact the success and cost of overall treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
R T Erasmus and A E Zemlin
Clinical audit in the laboratory
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2009; 62(7): 593 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Walking London's Medical History