RSM logo
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:535-538
doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008127
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackay, R J
Right arrow Articles by Woods, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personal View

Uncertainty of sweat chloride testing: does the right hand know what the left hand is doing?

R J Mackay, C M Florkowski, P M George, C W Sies and S Woods


Biochemistry Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, PO Box 151, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand


Corresponding author: Dr R J Mackay. Email: richard.mackay{at}cdhb.govt.nz


Although analytical variation in sweat electrolyte testing can be easily estimated, there is limited data on total variation. This study aims to evaluate the total variation of the sweat test by measuring the difference between sweat electrolyte values in specimens obtained simultaneously from two sites. Chloride is recommended in published guidelines as the only discriminant for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, and sodium may be measured as a guide to the adequacy of collection and analysis. Both are reported here. Sweat was collected in patients by the Gibson Cooke method from two sites simultaneously. Coefficient of variation in this laboratory is 4.1 and 5% for chloride and sodium, respectively. 295 patients had sufficient sweat collected from both sites for analysis. The values for chloride and sodium were compared between the two sites. The total coefficient of variation (CVt) calculated for the whole group between the two sites was 20.2% for chloride and 16.9% for sodium, and the standard deviations 4.3 mmol/L and 4.8 mmol/L, respectively. In patients with intermediate chloride concentrations; in different age groups; and when those tests with a difference between sodium and chloride concentration of more than 15 were excluded, minimal differences in these figures were observed. Use of strictly defined cut-off points to discriminate between normal and intermediate electrolyte values, and between intermediate and raised electrolyte values, does not reflect the variation in sweat electrolyte content found within an individual patient. This has important implications for reporting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor