Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 46, Number 1 > Pp. 79-81

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carter, G. D Articles by Jones, J. C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Short Report

Use of a common standard improves the performance of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin-D

Graham D Carter and Julia C Jones

Clinical Chemistry Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK

Corresponding author: Julia C Jones. Email: Julia.jones{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is becoming increasingly popular for measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin-D (25-OH-D). Results submitted to the International Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) have shown poor interlaboratory agreement. We investigated whether the use of a common standard would reduce interlaboratory imprecision.

Methods: A commercial standard and two controls were distributed with the DEQAS samples in January 2008. Participants were asked to calculate the results of samples and controls using their usual standard and the commercial standard. A method questionnaire was also distributed.

Results: Use of a common standard reduced the mean interlaboratory imprecision (coefficient of variation [CV]) for total 25-OH-D from 16.4% (in-house standards) to 10.4% (common standard). For 25-OH-D₃ and 25-OH-D₂, the mean CVs were reduced from 16.7% and 21.1% to 8.5% and 12.6%, respectively. Mean values obtained for total 25-OH-D using the common standard were higher by 6.1%.

Conclusions: Use of a common standard improved agreement among laboratories using LC-MS/MS methods for 25-OH-D. This suggests that problems with assay standardization contribute to interlaboratory imprecision. This may be related to the nature of the matrix used for working standards or errors in the calibration of stock standard solutions of 25-OH-D. Some participants used a gravimetric method, others UV spectrophotometry, to establish the concentration of stock solutions. Among the latter group there was uncertainty over the molar absorption coefficient of 25-OH-D solutions. We conclude that LC-MS/MS is not yet sufficiently robust to become the reference method for 25-OH-D and that gas chromatography-mass spectrometry might be a more suitable candidate.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. D. Carter 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Assays: The Quest For Accuracy Clin. Chem., July 1, 2009; 55(7): 1300 - 1302. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. D Fraser Standardization of vitamin D assays: art or science? Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]