Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 46, Number 1 > Pp. 8-17

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ceriotti, F. Articles by Panteghini, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Review Article

Reference intervals: the way forward

Ferruccio Ceriotti¹, Rolf Hinzmann² and Mauro Panteghini³

¹ Diagnostica e Ricerca San Raffaele S.p.A, Milan, Italy; ² Sysmex Europe GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany; ³ Department of Clinical Sciences ‘Luigi Sacco’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Corresponding author: Ferruccio Ceriotti. Email: ceriotti.ferruccio{at}hsr.it

New facts have recently enhanced interest in the topic of reference intervals. In particular, the International Organization for Standardization standard 15189, requesting that ‘biological reference intervals shall be periodically reviewed’, and the directive of the European Union on in vitro diagnostic medical devices asking manufacturers to provide detailed information on reference intervals, have renewed interest in the subject. This review presents an update on the topic, discussing the theoretical aspects and the most critical issues. The basic approach to the definition of reference intervals proposed in the original International Federation of Clinical Chemistry documents still remain valid. The use of data mining to obtain reference data from existing databases has severe limitations. New statistical approaches to discard outliers and to compute reference limits have been recommended. On the other hand, perspectives opened by the improvement in standardization through the implementation of the concept of traceability suggest new models to define ‘common’ reference intervals that can be transferred and adopted by different clinical laboratories in order to decrease the proliferation of different reference intervals not always justified by differences in population characteristics or in analytical methodology.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G Fraser Reference change values: the way forward in monitoring Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2009; 46(3): 264 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H Barth Reference ranges still need further clarity Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]