Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 46, Number 3 > Pp. 247-249

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: acb.2009.008189v1 46/3/247    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Collier, G. Articles by Cunningham, S. K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Short Report

A study of the relationship between albuminuria, proteinuria and urinary reagent strips

Geraldine Collier¹, Marie Clare Greenan², Jennifer J Brady², Barbara Murray² and Sean K Cunningham¹

¹ Biochemistry Department; ² Department of Metabolism, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin

Corresponding author: Geraldine Collier. Email: gercollier{at}eircom.net

Background: The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between proteinuria and albuminuria and to assess the equivalence between the albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and the protein to creatinine ratio (PCR) at the cut-offs recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on chronic kidney disease. The sensitivity and specificity of the reagent strips used in our laboratory for the detection of clinical proteinuria was also assessed.

Methods: Urine samples (n = 117) were screened for protein using the Bayer Multistix 10SG and read manually. Urinary total protein and creatinine was measured on the Roche P Modular by the benzethonium chloride and kinetic Jaffe methods, respectively. Urinary albumin was measured by immunoturbidimetry on the Roche Cobas Mira.

Results: The relationship between urinary protein and albumin loss was non-linear (P < 0.05). As urinary protein loss increased the percentage of albumin to total protein increased. At the NICE guidance recommended cut-offs for clinical proteinuria (ACR 30 mg/mmol and PCR 50 mg/mmol) there was one discordant result between ACR and PCR (ACR <30 mg/mmol and PCR >50 mg/mmol). The Bayer Multistix 10SG had a sensitivity and specificity of 97% and 62%, respectively, for the detection of clinical proteinuria compared with ACR.

Conclusions: The proportion of urinary total protein attributable to albumin changes with concentration. There was only one discordant result between ACR and PCR: therefore either ratio may be used for the identification of clinical proteinuria. As a screening test for proteinuria, the Bayer Multistix 10SG had an acceptable sensitivity but poor specificity.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Guy, J. K Borzomato, R. G Newall, P. A Kalra, and C. P Price Protein and albumin-to-creatinine ratios in random urines accurately predict 24 h protein and albumin loss in patients with kidney disease Ann Clin Biochem, November 1, 2009; 46(6): 468 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J Lamb, F. MacKenzie, and P. E Stevens How should proteinuria be detected and measured? Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2009; 46(3): 205 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]