Annals of Clinical Biochemistry > Volume 46, Number 6 > Pp. 517-519

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: acb.2009.009083v1 46/6/517    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Jones, G. R. D. PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Short Reports

Critical difference calculations revised: inclusion of variation in standard deviation with analyte concentration

Graham Ross Dallas Jones^1,2

¹ Department of Chemical Pathology, SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia; ² Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia

Corresponding author: Graham Ross Dallas Jones, Department of Chemical Pathology, SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. Email: gjones{at}stvincents.com.au

Background: The critical difference (CD), the smallest difference between sequential laboratory results which is associated with a true change in the patient, is commonly calculated by assuming the same standard deviation (SD) for the initial and subsequent measurements. The calculation of the CD is re-examined without making this assumption.

Methods: A formula for CD is developed, which specifies that even with the assumption of constant coefficient of variations (CV) at the two measurement concentrations used in the calculation, there will be different SDs due to different concentrations.

Results: The effect of removing the assumption of constant SD is to increase the CD for rises in analyte concentration and to decrease the CD for falls in concentration. These effects are caused by increased SD for the second measurement compared with the first when the second measurement is higher, and the reverse when the second is lower.

Conclusions: Replacing the usual assumption of similar total result SD for both measurements included in the CD calculation with a calculation of the SD at both analyte concentrations leads to an increase in the magnitude of the CD for rises in analyte concentration and a decrease for falls in analyte concentration. This change is proposed for all forms of CD calculations.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?