Biochemistry Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, PO Box 151, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand
Corresponding author: Dr R J Mackay. Email: richard.mackay{at}cdhb.govt.nz
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of the importance of the test in diagnostic decision-making, guidelines for the performance of the sweat test have recently been published in order to attempt to standardize the performance of the test.3–5
In these guidelines, a cut-off of 40 mmol/L for chloride has been recommended in order to discriminate between healthy patients and those with an increased chance of CF. Likewise, a cut-off of 60 mmol/L has been proposed to separate the patients highly likely to have CF from those with increased chance.
However, cut-off values which are interpreted rigidly could potentially be misleading, especially if the uncertainty of the measurement is significant. Such uncertainties could occur, for example, from the procedures of sweat collection, analytical imprecision, and within-subject and temporal variations. These uncertainties of measurement may have led to significant misclassification, with false positives up to 15% and false negatives up to 12%.4
Recently, many clinical laboratories have been expressing the degree of analytical uncertainty in a way that can be understood by clinicians,6 as a consequence of undertaking accreditation to ISO 15189 standard.7 Generally, this is to establish an uncertainty of measurement figure for each assay, which is twice the standard deviation (SD), that is, approximately the 5th and 95th percentile values, of the mean value of the quality control at each level. While this establishes the analytical uncertainty, it does not take into account other sources of variation. It is therefore useful to be able to offer clinicians information about the size and nature of variations arising from other sources.
It has been an established practise in this laboratory over many years to analyse sweat collected from two sites simultaneously, in order to minimize any re-collections necessary. This has created a unique opportunity to explore our data, in order to evaluate the differences in electrolyte values recorded between the two sites as a way of measuring the total coefficient of variation (CVt) of the test. This figure is a sum of variation due to analysis, within-patient variations, and collection variations. It does not take into account variation which occurs over time.
| Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tests were reported clinically as values for both chloride and sodium for right and left arms separately, together with an interpretive comment. If the test on one side did not yield sufficient weight, only the single test was reported. A sweat rate of >1 mg/m2/minute was required, which given the size of our collecting surface area was 50 mg weight.
Data were analysed using the MedCalc for Windows (MedCalc Software, Belgium) software version 8.2. The SD between paired values was calculated and variance derived. The mean of the sum of variances is the mean variance, and the square root is the mean SD, from which the coefficient of variation can be derived. This was done for the group as a whole and separately for those with one or more values in the 30–70 mmol/L range, that is, between the two cut-off values recommended by the guidelines3–5 plus or minus about two SD.
This analysis was repeated for the age groups 0–6 months; 6–12 months; 1–5 years; and over 5 years separately, and again for those with a difference of chloride and sodium values of 15 mmol/L or less. We also evaluated the relationship of sweat weight and age, and sweat chloride and age.
Lastly, the number of patients for whom the classification (normal, intermediate, raised) would change as a result of the differences between the paired values was obtained, both as a fraction of the whole, and as a fraction of those with intermediate values.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean and median population sweat weight and sweat chloride and sodium values and confidence intervals for each site are shown in Table 1. This indicates that there is no important systematic difference between the two sites not accounted for by random error and the size of the population. Similar values were recorded in a previous publication9; however, the latter underestimate the population distribution, because they appear to have been compiled by pooling the values from the two sites, which are not independent values.
|
|
2 SD, the SD becomes 7.2 mmol/L and 7.0 mmol/L for chloride and sodium, respectively and the CVt becomes 17.2 and 15.9%. The variation between the chloride concentrations obtained from the two different sites would suggest, had only one site been tested, that up to 13 patients (4.4% of the total group, 48% of those with at least one intermediate values) could be classified differently.
There was no correlation of sweat weight and age (R2 = <0.0002 for both left and right tests), nor was there any correlation of sweat weight and chloride value (R2 = <0.035 for both left and right tests). Although it was not possible to directly compare CVt for different sweat volumes, there was no relation between variance and sweat volume (R2 = 0.006).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a previous study aimed at developing a method for sweat test quality assurance9 utilising simultaneous bilateral sweat electrolyte values, the author calculated the population SDs for normal (<40), intermediate (40–60) and raised (>60) results. Regression analysis was used to demonstrate the agreement between two testing sites. It was suggested that comparison of current year parameters with previous year parameters might help to provide some quality assurance. However, the evolution of statistical techniques since then allows a fresh view of data acquired in a similar way.
More recently, in a study of adult volunteers10 over two years, sweat was stimulated by pilocarpine iontophoresis and collected by Wescor Macroduct (Wescor Inc, Utah, USA) on eight occasions in three, and 12 occasions in one subject. Total %CV was calculated as 14.9–32.9% in different individuals. This is even higher than our own figures, probably because it includes temporal variation as well.
In a study,11 of sweat conductivity values, (which in themselves are not directly comparable with sweat electrolyte values), sweat conductivity was assessed weekly for five weeks in 15 healthy adult volunteers, 20 healthy infants and 20 known CF patients. Although their group is not entirely comparable with ours, the within-subject CVt of their healthy infant group was 18%, a value consistent with our CVt of 20.2% (for the whole group).
The NCCLS (CLSI) guidelines3 suggest, as an index of internal quality control, that sweat sodium and chloride concentrations agree within 15 mmol/L. The evidence for adopting this measure appears to be expert opinion and it is hard to perceive how much scientific merit is in this, particularly as the chloride:sodium ratio varies significantly with total concentration. In our study, use of this exclusionary criterion did not improve the CVt. Paired testing however, coupled with knowledge of the variation to be expected, is a more precise way of confirming test validity.
Calculated from our data, the total variation for the whole group means that a chloride value of 40 (i.e. at the proposed lower cut-off), has a 95% probability of lying between 31 and 49 (40 ± 2 x SD for overall values), and for a value of 60 (the upper proposed cut-off), a 95% probability of lying between 51 and 69. Should the CVt value for the intermediate sweat test group be used, the situation might be worse. These are rather wide limits and call into question the usefulness of adhering to fixed cut-off values for the purposes of reporting. This is especially so, as these values quantify the difference between simultaneous sweat tests, but do not take into account differences within an individual over time, nor of inter-assay variability.
Defined cut-off values, in addition, fail to take account of the fact that the CF spectrum is likely to be continuously distributed12 between those who have no disease at all, through mild symptoms and signs, to severe manifestations, with a corresponding range of increasingly severe electrolyte changes. Furthermore, the diagnosis of CF must take into account not only the sweat test and mutation results, but a critical evaluation of the clinical presentation of the patients.13
An evidence-based laboratory medicine method of expressing the result of a sweat test might therefore reflect this degree of uncertainty in a way that is understood and useful for clinicians. An option might be to quote sweat chloride values together with a figure for analytical uncertainty of measurement and for individual variables, derived from this and similar studies.
We conclude that when intra-individual variation is taken into account, application of prescribed cut-off values to classify tests fails to reflect the reality of variation. We submit that cut-off values which could potentially misclassify up to 33% of patients with intermediate results are inappropriate, and may obscure the continuous distribution of the manifestations of disease in the CF spectrum. In the light of both biological and analytical considerations, CF should be regarded as a spectrum disorder and a dichotomous assignment of disease or no disease may not be appropriate. Further, comparable results from sweat collected from two sites simultaneously permits improved confidence and is a useful internal quality control procedure. The uncertainty inherent in the collection and measurement of sweat chloride could be recognized in the reporting of these values. It is suggested that bodies publishing future guidelines recognize variability arising from the collection as well as analysis of sweat electrolytes, and that this is reflected in recommendations for reporting.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||