This version was published on 1 November 2008
Ann Clin Biochem 2008;
45:571-574
doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008018
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry
Original Articles
Measurement of cholesterol concentrations of major serum lipoprotein classes in haemodialysis patients by anion-exchange chromatography
Yuji Hirowatari1,
Hiroshi Yoshida2,
Yuriko Fueki3,
Masayuki Ito3,
Yutaka Ogura1,
Nobuyuki Sakurai4 and
Takashi Miida5
1 Bioscience Division, Tosoh Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan;
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan;
3 Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan;
4 Murakami Memorial Hospital, Niigata, Japan;
5 Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Corresponding author: Dr Yuji Hirowatari. Email: hirowata{at}tosoh.co.jp
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Background: Increased triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins and decreased
HDL that are implicated in the progression of atherosclerotic
vascular diseases, are present in serum samples of patients
undergoing haemodialysis (HD) therapy. Therefore, it is important
to measure serum TG-rich lipoprotein concentrations to prevent
the diseases.
Methods: The cholesterol concentrations of lipoprotein classes in serum samples from the HD patients (n = 18) and healthy subjects (n = 18) were analysed by our recently developed method of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), in which the lipoprotein classes were separated using an anion-exchange column, and the cholesterol concentrations of each of those were measured enzymatically using a post-column reaction. The ability of fractionated lipoprotein cholesterol determination by this HPLC method is mostly equivalent to the determination ability of an ultracentrifugation (UC).
Results: HDL, LDL, and TG-rich lipoproteins, i.e. IDL, VLDL and chylomicrons, were well separated in the chromatograms. HDL cholesterol concentrations in the HD patients were significantly lower than in the healthy subjects (P < 0.0001), and IDL cholesterol concentrations and VLDL cholesterol concentrations in the HD patients were significantly higher than in the healthy subjects (P < 0.05). Profiles of these measured lipoprotein values were consistent with the previously reported lipoprotein values, measured ultracentrifugally characteristic of HD patients.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the HPLC method may be sufficiently applied to the assessment of serum lipoprotein profile in HD patients in place of the other method including an UC.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) therapy over a long term
are susceptible to premature cardiovascular diseases.
1 It is
also known that cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality
in HD patients.
2,3 HD patients have a characteristic dyslipidaemia
typified by hypertriglyceridaemia.
4–6 Serum lipoprotein
fractions of HD patients with dyslipidaemia is characterized
by increased concentrations of VLDL and intermediate-density
lipoproteins (IDL), mostly normally ranged concentrations of
LDL and decreased HDL.
4,5 The increased triglyceride (TG)-rich
lipoproteins and decreased HDL are implicated in the progression
of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.
4–6 Therefore,
it is important to monitor the concentrations of TG-rich lipoproteins
in HD patients to prevent cardiovascular diseases. However,
TG-rich lipoproteins in HD patients are basically analysed using
an ultracentrifugation (UC) method, which is time-consuming
and laborious. It is known that the other methods, including
gel-permeation chromatography and electrophoresis, have a poor
ability to separate heterogeneous TG-rich lipoproteins.
7,8 We
have recently developed a convenient method for analysing serum
fractionated lipoprotein classes by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) with an anion-exchange column, which has
a high ability to separate TG-rich lipoproteins, IDL, VLDL and
chylomicron.
9 In our developed HPLC method, cholesterol concentrations
of HDL, LDL, IDL, VLDL and chylomicron were highly correlated
with those estimated by the UC method.
9 Therefore, we attempted
to measure cholesterol concentrations of TG-rich lipoprotein
classes in HD patients using the HPLC method.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
The study samples were obtained from HD patients (
n = 18) and
the same number of age-matched healthy subjects after a 12 hour-overnight
fast. Their clinical characteristics were shown in Table
1.
The HD patients included subjects with diabetes mellitus (
n = 11) and chronic glomerulonephritis (
n = 7), and were undergoing
thrice-weekly three- to four-hour HD therapy using high-flux
polysulphone dialysis membranes (Toray Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan)
and standard heparin doses for anti-coagulation.
The column size and the flow rates in the HPLC method reported
previously
9 was partially modified, and used for measuring cholesterol
concentrations of serum lipoprotein classes (HDL, LDL, IDL,
VLDL and chylomicron) The anion-exchange column, which contained
2.5
µm of non-porous polymer-based gel with diethylaminoethyl
ligands, and 3.0 mm ID
x 25 mm in size, and a post-column reactor,
which contained an enzymatic cholesterol reagent (TCHO-CL, Serotec
Co., Hokkaido, Japan), were used for the modified HPLC method.
The flow rates of eluent and the enzymatic cholesterol reagent
were 0.5 mL/minute and 0.2 mL/minute, respectively. It took
23 minutes to complete the assay of one sample. Serum sample
(4.5
µL) was injected to the column, and lipoprotein classes
in the sample were eluted by a step-gradient of perchlorate
ion concentrations in order. Serum sample (500
µL) was
mixed with 250
µL of the stock solution (sucrose 760 g/L,
EDTA2K 1.5 g/L), and stored at –40°C until measured.
The stored samples were analysed within one month. The coefficient
data of variation in between-day assay (
n = 10) and within-day
assay (
n = 10) using hyperlipidaemic serum samples by this HPLC
method were as follows: HDL cholesterol 3.2 and 1.8%, LDL cholesterol
3.2 and 2.0%, IDL cholesterol 7.3 and 3.4%, VLDL cholesterol
5.0 and 3.3% and chylomicron cholesterol 7.5 and 6.1%, respectively.
Total cholesterol, TG, and creatinine concentrations were measured enzymatically with commercially available kits (Daiichi Pure Chemical Industries, Tokyo, Japan). Apolipoprotein concentrations were measured by immuno-nephelometry with commercial kits (Daiichi Pure Chemical Industries).
Results were expressed as mean ± SD. The comparative significance of variables between the different groups was assessed with an unpaired Welch's t-test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Figure
1 shows the typical chromatograms of serum samples
from the two HD patients and the healthy subject. In the chromatograms,
HDL, LDL, IDL, VLDL and chylomicron were sufficiently separated.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Chromatograms in serum samples from haemodialysis (HD) patient and healthy subject. Part figures a, b, and c are chromatograms of a healthy serum (a) and serum samples of two HD patients' (b and c), respectively. The basic data of sex, age and cholesterol concentrations of HDL, LDL, IDL, VLDL and chylomicrons were as follows: (a) male, 65, 1.58 mmol/L, 3.06 mmol/L, 0.305 mmol/L, 0.148 mmol/L and 0.031 mmol/L; (b) male, 62, 0.94 mmol/L, 2.83 mmol/L, 0.506 mmol/L, 0.344 mmol/L and 0.039 mmol/L; (c) female, 61, 1.12 mmol/L, 2.23 mmol/L, 0.393 mmol/L, 0.155 mmol/L and 0.144 mmol/L, respectively
|
|
Body mass index, total cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 of
the HD patients were significantly lower than those of age-
and sex-matched healthy subjects (
P < 0.05,
P < 0.05 and
P < 0.0001, respectively), while systolic BP, creatinine
and TG of the HD patients were significantly higher than those
of the healthy subjects (
P < 0.001,
P < 0.0001 and
P <
0.001, respectively) as shown in Table
1. In the HPLC analysis,
HDL cholesterol concentrations of the HD patients were significantly
lower than those of the healthy subjects (
P < 0.0001), and
IDL and VLDL cholesterol concentrations of the HD patients were
significantly higher than those of the healthy subjects (
P <
0.05) (Table
1).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
HDL, LDL, VLDL and chylomicron in human serum samples can be
well separated using gel-permeation chromatography or agarose-gel
electrophoresis, but IDL cannot be sufficiently separated.
7,8 Therefore, we conducted the separation of lipoprotein classes
in human serum samples by the HPLC method with the anion-exchange
column, and two HDL peaks, one broad LDL peak, one small IDL
peak and one broad VLDL peak can be insufficiently separated
in a hyperlipidaemic serum using the anion-exchange chromatography
with 0–155 mmol/L linear gradient of sodium perchlorate
(data not shown). Hence, we established the novel anion-exchange
chromatographic method with a step-gradient of sodium perchlorate
concentration for the sufficient separation of HDL, LDL, IDL,
VLDL and chylomicron in human serum.
9 The present study attempted
to analyse lipoprotein profiles of HD patients using the HPLC
method.
In the present study, HDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower, and IDL and VLDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in the HD patients than age- and sex-matched control subjects. In addition, LDL cholesterol concentrations were modestly but insignificantly lower in the HD patients compared with the control subjects. Using the UC method, Shoji et al.4,5 reported that HDL and LDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower, and IDL and VLDL cholesterol values were significantly higher in HD patients than in control subjects. Quaschning et al.6 reported that when compared four groups of HD patients (HD-NTG group, normotriglyceridaemic HD patients without diabetes mellitus; HD-HTG group, hypertriglyceridaemic HD patients without diabetes mellitus; HD-NIDDM-NTG group, normotriglyceridaemic HD patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; HD-NIDDM-HTG, hypertriglyceridaemic HD patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) with control subjects, HDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower in HD-HTG and HD-NIDDM-HTG groups than in control subjects, LDL cholesterol concentrations were similarly calculated between the four groups of HD patients and control subjects, and VLDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in HD-HTG, HD-NIDDM-NTG and HD-NIDDM-HTG groups than in control subjects, revealed by the UC method.
In the UC method, 200 µL of plasma was mixed with the appropriate density solution with potassium bromide, and the sample was spun in three hours.4,5 The HPLC method required only a small volume of sample (4.5 µL) to determine the cholesterol concentrations of major lipoprotein classes. In addition, the assay time of one sample was merely 23 minutes in the HPLC method, so that subsequently any alteration of sample lipoproteins may be little found during the course of lipoprotein separation in the HPLC assay in contrast to the UC method which may have the possibility of altering lipoproteins because of requiring long assay times.
Recently, non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol – HDL cholesterol) has been proposed as a risk marker for cardiovascular diseases.10,11 Several epidemiologic studies have shown that non-HDL cholesterol is a better predictor of cardiovascular events than LDL cholesterol, and that non-HDL cholesterol is a potential predictor of risk for carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly.12–14 Nishizawa et al.15 have reported that non-HDL cholesterol was a significant and independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in HD patients. Precise measurement of non-HDL cholesterol may be more useful in HD patients with elevated TG, because HD patients have normal concentrations of LDL cholesterol in contrast to increased TG-rich lipoproteins. In HD patients, IDL and VLDL cholesterol presumably account for major part of non-HDL cholesterol. Furthermore, several studies have reported that increased concentrations of VLDL and IDL were associated with the increased cardiovascular risk.16–21 Koba et al.16 reported that an increased number of VLDL particles was strongly associated with coronary heart disease in men. Tatami et al.17 also reported that moderately increased concentrations of IDL cholesterol were closely associated with a high frequency of coronary heart disease in consecutive patients evaluated by selective coronary cineangiography. Therefore, because the precise measurement of IDL and VLDL cholesterol is likely to be useful for cardiovascular risk assessment in HD patients, our convenient HPLC assay for IDL and VLDL cholesterol may be helpful in clinical practice for HD patients.
In conclusion, HD patients have the impaired lipoprotein metabolism characteristic of the elevated TG-rich lipoproteins (IDL and VLDL) in lipoprotein profiles analysed by our developed HPLC method, of which data were consistent with those shown by the other study groups with the UC method. HPLC chromatograms show the excellent separation of TG-rich lipoproteins. Taken together, our developed HPLC method may be sufficiently applied to the routine assay for TG-rich lipoproteins in clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidaemia to prevent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in HD patients.
 |
GRANT/FUNDING SUPPORT
|
|---|
The present study was supported by a grant from Tosoh Corporation
and the Jikei University Research Fund.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|---|
We wish to thank Mika Komori and Yukako Uchihashi for their
excellent technical assistance.
(Accepted May 20, 2008)
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Igel-Korcagova A, Raab P, Brensing KA, et al. Cholesterol metabolism in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. J Nephrol 2003;16:850–4[Medline]
- Cheung AK, Sarnak MJ, Yan G, et al. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2000;58:353–62[Medline]
- Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2003;108:2154–69[Free Full Text]
- Shoji T, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, et al. Atherogenic lipoprotein changes in the absence of hyperlipidemia in patients with chronic renal failure treated by hemodialysis. Atherosclerosis 1997;131:229–36[Medline]
- Shoji T, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, et al. Intermediate-density lipoprotein as an independent risk factor for aortic atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998;9:1277–84[Abstract]
- Quaschning T, Schomig M, Keller M, et al. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia impair lipoprotein metabolism in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:332–41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Usui S, Hara Y, Hosaki S, Okazaki M. A new on-line dual enzymatic method for simultaneous quantification of cholesterol and triglycerides in lipoproteins by HPLC. J Lipid Res 2002;43:805–14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sato I, Taniguchi T, Ishikawa Y, et al. The lipoprotein fraction between VLDL and LDL detected by biphasic agarose gel electrophoresis reflects serum remnant lipoprotein and Lp(a) concentrations. J Atheroscler Thromb 2006;13:55–61[Medline]
- Hirowatari Y, Yoshida H, Kurosawa H, et al. Measurement of cholesterol of major serum lipoprotein classes by anion-exchange HPLC with perchlorate ion-containing eluent. J Lipid Res 2003;44:1404–12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97[Free Full Text]
- American Diabetes Association. Management of dyslipidemia in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:S83–6[Medline]
- Cui Y, Blumenthal RS, Flaws JA, et al. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1413–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lu W, Jain AK, Resnick HE, et al. Non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:16–23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kawamoto R, Oka Y, Tomita H, Kodama A. Non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. J Atheroscler Thromb 2005;12:143–8[Medline]
- Nishizawa Y, Shoji T, Kakiya R, et al. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2003;63(Suppl. 84):S117–S120
- Koba S, Hirano T, Sakaue T, Takeuchi H, Adachi M, Katagiri T. An incresaed number of very-low-density lipoprotein particles is strongly associated with coronary heart disease in Japanese men, independently of intermediate-density lipoprotein or low-density lipoprotein. Coron Artery Dis 2002;13:255–62[Medline]
- Tatami R, Mabuchi H, Ueda K, et al. Intermediate-density lipoprotein and cholesterol-rich very low density lipoprotein in angiographically determined coronary artery disease. Circulation 1981;64:1174–84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Steiner G, Schwartz L, Shumak S, Poapst M. The association of increased levels of intermediate-density lipoproteins with smoking and with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1987;75:124–30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sacks FM, Alaupovic P, Moye LA, et al. VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the cholesterol and recurrent events (CARE) Trial. Circulation 2000;102:1886–92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Whayne TF, Alaupovic P, Curry MD, Lee ET, Anderson PS, Schechter E. Plasma apolipoprotein B and VLDL-, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol as risk factors in the development of coronary artery disease in male patients examined by angiography. Atherosclerosis 1981;39:411–24[Medline]
- Krauss RM, Lindgren FT, Williams PT, et al. Intermediate-density lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease in hyperchole sterolaemic men. Lancet 1987;2:62–6[Medline]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?