RSM logo
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
First published on 9 September 2008, doi:acb.2008.008024
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2008;45:604.
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
acb.2008.008024v1
45/6/604    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, L. F
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, C. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Short Report

Effect of delay in sampling on haemoglobin determined by faecal immunochemical tests

Louise F Brown1 and Callum G Fraser2


1 Department of Biochemical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School; 2 Scottish Bowel Screening Centre Laboratory, Kings Cross, Dundee, UK


Corresponding author: Louise F Brown. Email: l.brown3{at}nhs.net


Background: Faeces must be sampled directly onto guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) cards since analysis of specimens collected in traditional faeces containers is inappropriate because degradation of haemoglobin continues after faeces have been passed. Newer faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are replacing FOBT, but it is likely that the practice of obtaining specimens in traditional faeces collection containers for later analysis will continue. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of delay in stool sampling on FIT.

Methods: Five specimens of faeces from healthy volunteers, all qualitatively FIT negative, were supplemented with whole blood haemolysate to three different FIT positive concentrations. Each sample was analysed daily after 1–14 days delay using a quantitative latex immunoturbidimetric-based FIT and also after five and ten days delay using a qualitative FIT.

Results: Haemoglobin concentrations fell each day, the rate being generally proportional to the original haemoglobin concentration. After eight days delay, no sample had a haemoglobin concentration >100 ng/mL and, after nine days, no sample had a haemoglobin concentration >50 ng/mL. After five days delay, five of the 15 supplemented faeces with initially positive qualitative FIT had negative FIT; after 10 days, none had positive FIT.

Conclusion: False-negative results will occur if sampling of fresh faeces into or onto FIT collection devices is delayed. Laboratories that undertake FIT analyses on faeces collected into traditional containers are likely to miss significant neoplasia. FIT collection devices must be used for sampling fresh faeces.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic