Calculated free testosterone in men: comparison of four equations and with free androgen index

Ann Clin Biochem 2006;43:389-397
doi:10.1258/000456306778520115
© 2006 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

 

This Article
Right arrow

Full Text (PDF)

Right arrow
Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow
Email this article to a friend
Right arrow

Similar articles in this journal

Right arrow
Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow
Download to citation manager
Right arrow
Citing Articles
Right arrow
Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow
Articles by Ho, C. K.
Right arrow
Articles by Beckett, G. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow
PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?

Original Articles


Clement KM Ho,
Mary Stoddart,
Melanie Walton,
Richard A Anderson and
Geoffrey J Beckett


Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK;
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK


Background: Serum testosterone remains the most important investigationin the diagnosis of androgen deficiency in men. Most of thecirculating testosterone is bound to albumin and sex hormone-bindingglobulin (SHBG), whereas free testosterone accounts for approximately2% of total testosterone. Because direct measurement of freetestosterone is impractical in routine practice, several equationsare used to provide clinically useful estimates of free testosteroneconcentration. This study aimed to (1) obtain locally derivedreference limits for total testosterone and calculated freetestosterone (CFT) concentrations, and (2) critically evaluatethe equations commonly used to estimate free testosterone.

Methods: Serum total testosterone, SHBG and albumin were assayedin morning blood samples obtained from 126 healthy men (aged20-45 years) known to have normal semen analysis. CFT concentrationscalculated using four published methods (i.e. the Sodergard,Nanjee-Wheeler, Vermeulen and Ly-Handelsman equations) werecompared with one another and the free androgen index.

Results: Reference intervals for total testosterone and CFT by the Vermeulen equation were 9.4-31.0 nmol/L and 0.245-0.785 nmol/L (2.5-97.5 percentile), respectively. CFT values varied considerably with the four equations examined. Mean biases ranged from 5.8 to 56.0%; the Nanjee-Wheeler and Ly-Handelsman equations yielded positive and negative biases, respectively, against the other equations. Free androgen index was shown to correlate poorly with CFT (r2 = 0.21-0.46) and over-estimate the CFT atlow SHBG concentrations.

Conclusions: We have used various equations to derive referenceranges for CFT in healthy men aged 20-45 years. We suggest thatCFT be incorporated into the investigation regimen for suspectedhypogonadism when total testosterone results are equivocal.


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?






This article has been cited by other articles:

Home page Eur J EndocrinolHome page

J. H Barth, H. P Field, E. Yasmin, and A. H Balen
Defining hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary syndrome: measurement of testosterone and androstenedione by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and analysis by receiver operator characteristic plots
Eur. J. Endocrinol.,

March 1, 2010;

162(3):

611 – 615.

[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]


Home page Ann Clin BiochemHome page

G. Sartorius, L. P Ly, K. Sikaris, R. McLachlan, and D. J Handelsman
Predictive accuracy and sources of variability in calculated free testosterone estimates
Ann Clin Biochem,

March 1, 2009;

46(2):

137 – 143.

[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]