Audit of acute hypoglycaemia in children: re-audit of procedures for diagnosis

Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:486-488
doi:10.1258/acb.2008.008037
© 2008 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

 

 

This Article
Right arrow
Full Text
Right arrow

Full Text (PDF)

Right arrow
Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow
Email this article to a friend
Right arrow

Similar articles in this journal

Right arrow
Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow
Download to citation manager
Right arrow
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow
Articles by Lang, T. F
Right arrow
Articles by Hanna, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow
PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?

Original Articles


Timothy F Lang1,
David Cardy1,
Dennis Carson2,
Clodagh M Loughrey3 and
Elinor Hanna4


1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA;
2 Department of Child Health, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ;
3 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland;
4 Clinical Biochemistry, Princess of Wales Hospital, Coity Road, Bridgend CF31 1RQ, Wales, UK


Corresponding author: Dr Tim F Lang. Email: tim.lang{at}belfasttrust.hscni.net


Background: A protocol exists for the collection of samples to investigateunexplained hypoglycaemia, termed the ‘hypopack’.These packs are kept in Accident and Emergency departments andneonatal special care baby units throughout Northern Irelandand most wards of the Regional Children’s Hospital. A retrospectiveaudit of 107 hypopacks received between July 2001 and December2003 highlighted a number of problems: samples collected whenthe patient was receiving dextrose, incomplete clinical historyprovided, insufficient and haemolysed samples received and poorfiling of reports in charts. These were addressed by re-designingthe request form, updating the protocol and introducing a summativereport. The new protocol was introduced in April 2006.

Methods: The aim of this study is to assess whether the revised protocolimproved utility of the hypopack. A retrospective re-audit of100 hypopacks received between April 2006 and May 2007 was performed.

Results: Forty-nine percent of patients were hypoglycaemic (<2.6 mmol/L)compared with 35% in the original audit. In both audits, 33%of laboratory reports were missing from patients’ charts. Onecase of medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, threecases of hyperinsulinism and two endocrine-related cases wereidentified.

Conclusions: The new hypopack protocol has increased the number of appropriatelyperformed investigations. Provision of information concerningdextrose infusion has assisted the interpretation of the hypopackresults.


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?