Tumour markers requesting pattern with regards to different organizational settings in Italy: a survey of hospital laboratories

This version was published on 1 July 2009

Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:316-321
doi:10.1258/acb.2009.008240
© 2009 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

 

This Article
Right arrow
Figures Only
Right arrow
Full Text
Right arrow

Full Text (PDF)

Right arrow
All Versions of this Article:

acb.2009.008240v1

46/4/316

most recent

Right arrow
Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow
Email this article to a friend
Right arrow

Similar articles in this journal

Right arrow
Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow
Download to citation manager
Right arrow
Google Scholar
Right arrow
Articles by Franceschini, R.
Right arrow
Articles by Gion, M.
PubMed
Right arrow
PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?

Original Articles


Roberta Franceschini1,
Chiara Trevisiol1,
Ruggero Dittadi2 and
Massimo Gion1,2,3


1 Association ABO for the Application of Biotechnologies in Oncology c/o Centre for the Study of Biological Markers of Malignancy;
2 Unit of Laboratory Medicine;
3 Centre for the Study of Biological Markers of Malignancy/Consortium Istituto Oncologico Veneto I.R.C.C.S., Regional Hospital, AULSS 12, Venice, Italy


Corresponding author: Dr Roberta Franceschini. Email: laboratorioabo_firb{at}yahoo.it and cnabo{at}ulss12.ve.it


Background: Tumour markers are frequently used in clinical practice andthe reason for ordering varies considerably and often seemsto be inappropriate. We carried out a survey of Italian laboratorieson their current pattern of use.

Methods: Forty-four laboratories located in health-care institutionswith inpatient beds were surveyed about the organizational,clinical and methodological aspects of tumour markers ordering.

Results: Thirty-one laboratories (70%) filled in and returned the questionnaire. Overall, 977,786 tumour marker tests were scrutinized. The pattern of tumour marker use did not seem to be influenced by the institutional setting, by availability of oncology facilities or by adoption of clinical guidelines. In addition, the information flow from clinicians to the laboratory and vice versa was poor and informal.

Conclusions: Monitoring tumour marker pattern use can provide valuable informationfor health-care decision makers, highlighting potential inadequaciesin laboratory services but also identifying problems in otherareas of health-care delivery that could benefit from educationalprogrammes.


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?