Assessment of glomerular filtration rate by serum cystatin C in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

This version was published on 1 November 2009

Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:495-500
doi:10.1258/acb.2009.009065
© 2009 Association for Clinical Biochemistry

 

This Article
Right arrow
Figures Only
Right arrow
Full Text
Right arrow

Full Text (PDF)

Right arrow
All Versions of this Article:

acb.2009.009065v1

46/6/495

most recent

Right arrow
Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow
Email this article to a friend
Right arrow

Similar articles in this journal

Right arrow
Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow
Download to citation manager
Right arrow
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow
Articles by Wang, Q.-P.
Right arrow
Articles by Luo, X.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow
PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking

What’s this?

Original Articles


Qing-Ping Wang1,3,
Jian-Wen Gu1,
Xiang-Hong Zhan2,
Hui Li3 and
Xiang-Hang Luo3


1 Department of Clinical Laboratory;
2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003;
3 Institute of Endocrinology & Metabolism, The Second XiangYa Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China


Corresponding author: Xiang-Hang Luo. Email: xianghangluo{at}163.com


Background: Assessment of renal function in patients undergoing coronaryartery bypass grafting (CABG) is important. Cystatin C has beenproposed as an improved indicator of renal function. The aimof this study was to assess cystatin C as an early marker ofchanges in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after CABG.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from 61 CABG patients at different time points. Using 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA)clearance as a ‘gold standard’, we compared thecorrelations and non-parametric receiver operator characteristiccurves of serum cystatin C, serum creatinine and 24 h creatinineclearance (Ccr).

Results: The inverse of cystatin C correlated better with 51Cr-EDTA than those of serum creatinine and Ccr (r = 0.8578, 0.6771 and 0.6929, respectively). Cystatin C exhibited significantly superior diagnostic accuracy for detecting GFR <80 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared with serum creatinine (P = 0.013) and Ccr (P = 0.025); for detecting GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, cystatin C had similar diagnostic accuracy to Ccr (P = 0.812) but was superior to creatinine (P = 0.033). At the best cut-off value, cystatin C had sensitivity 89% and specificity 93% for detecting GFR <80 mL/min/1.73 m2, sensitivity 86% and specificity 96% for detecting GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Conclusions: Cystatin C is a better marker for detecting small temporarychanges of GFR in CABG patients. This may allow better identificationof patients with renal impairment.


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What’s this?